Similar Decisions

• NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0593 13

  Original file (NR0593 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

  Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 to 29% April 2011 (copy at Tab A), removing the service record page 1i (*Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 1 December 2010 and 10 May 2011 (copies at Tab 3) and changing his reenlistment code from RE-3C (Commandant of the Marine Corps...

• NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11543-08

  Original file (11543-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

  DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BUG Docket No: 11543-08 9 March 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Enclosure (3) clarifies the basis for the recommendation to remove the weight control entry for 10 February 1993 to 4 October 1996 and the page lid entry dated 27 January 2003. That any material or entries inconsistent with...

• NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04576-09

  Original file (04576-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

  Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) counseling entry dated 28 December 2007 and his rebuttal dated 31 December 2007, copies of which are in enclosure (1) at Tab Piss 2. The Board also finds that Petitioner’s rebuttal should be modified by removing...

• NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2570 14

  Original file (NR2570 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

  The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on & January 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (4) and (5), the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following...

• NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07838-10

  Original file (07838-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

  JAMS stated that the NUP “stemmed from [Petitioner’s] failure to report a civilian DUI arrest,” however, the UPB entry actually says he was punished “for failing to notify his command of his DUI conviction [emphasis added] .” JAM5 noted that “the requirement to report the conviction (rather than the arrest) is lawful.” d. Enclosure (4) explains that PERB directed removing the contested fitness report in light of enclosure (3). e. In enclosure (5), the Marine Corps Recruiting Command (MCRC)...

• NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06852-12

  Original file (06852-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

  DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry 8 February 2005, the page 11 entry dated 4/7/05 regarding violation of Article 128 (Uniform Code of Military Justice), and the page lla entry...

• NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10692-10

  Original file (10692-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

  Pursuant to the provisions of reference ta), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"”) entry dated 14 January 2009 (sic), a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bourgeois, J. Hicks and Ivins, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 February 2011, and...

• NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5935 14

  Original file (NR5935 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

  Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page ll ("Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 5 March 2013 and. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (2) and (3), the Board finds the existence of an error and...

• NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02803-07

  Original file (02803-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

  He further requested removal of the fitness report for 20 November 1998 to 31 March 1999 (copy at Tab C in enclosure (1)). d. In enclosure (3), Petitioner added his request to remove the page 11 entry dated 24 March 1999. e. In enclosure (4), the HQMC PERB commented to the effect that the contested fitness report should stand. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11d (“Administrative Remarks (1070) 7”) entry dated 24 March 1999.

• NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7865 14

  Original file (NR7865 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

  DEPARTMEW?T OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred tc as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070}") entries dated 15 October 2013 {copy at Tab A) and 8 April 2014 (copy at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Ms. Polk and Messrs. Exnicios and Grover, reviewed...